Gallarado v. Intermediate Appellate Court
G.R. No. L-67742
October 29, 1987
FACTS: Petitioners were nephew and niece of the late Pedro
Villanueva and first cousin of the private respondent Marta Villanueva
vda. de Agana, the latter being the daughter of Pedro
Villanueva. The subject matter of this controversy involves a parcel of
land situated in Cavinti, Laguna consisting of 81,300 square meters, more
or less, initially covered by an original Certificate of Title No. 2262,
issued on April 2, 1924 owned and registered in the name of the late Pedro Villanueva.
On August 10, 1937, petitioner claimed that the aforestated land was sold
to them in a private document, an unnotarized deed of sale written in
Tagalog that was allegedly signed by the late Pedro Villanueva conveying and
transferring the property in question in favor of the petitioners.
Subsequently, the Original Certificate of Title was cancelled and a new certificate
of title was issued in the name of the petitioners covered by Transfer Certificate
of Title No. RT- 6293 (No. 23350) on January 4, 1944. On November 17, 1976,
defendant Marta Villanueva together with Pedro Villanueva, Jr., and Restituto
R.Villanueva executed and filed an Affidavit of Adverse Claim with the Office
of the Register of Deeds of Laguna. When petitioners learned of this Affidavit
of Adverse Claim, attempt was made to settle said controversy amicably, but
they failed. So, petitioners instituted court suit against the private
respondent and her husband, Dr. Marcelo S. Agana, Sr. by filing a complaint for
Quieting of Title and Damages with the Court of First Instance of Laguna on
February 3, 1977.
The Court of
First Instance of Laguna rendered its decision declaring the deed of sale
of August 10, 1937, as well as the reconstituted transfer certificate of title of petitioners, void ab initio.
Thus,
petitioners filed notice of appeal to the Intermediate Appellate Court.
However, the Intermediate Appellate Court, on May 22, 1984, affirmed in toto the decision of the trial court. Hence, this petition.
ISSUE: Whether
or not there was a valid reconstitution of Transfer Certificate of TitleNo.
RT-6293 (No. 23350) issued in the names of petitioners.
HELD: No. Section 127 of Act 496 which requires, among other things, that the
conveyance be executed "before the judge of a court of record or clerk of
a court of record or a notary public or a justice of the peace, who shall
certify such acknowledgment substantially in form next hereinafter stated” was
violated.
The action of
the Register of Deeds of Laguna in allowing the registration of the private deed of sale was
unauthorized and did not lend a bit
of validity to the defective private document of sale. With
reference to the special law, Section 127 of the Land Registration Act,
Act 496 “Deeds of Conveyance, affecting lands, whether registered under this
act or unregistered shall be sufficient in law when made substantially in
accordance with the following forms, and shall be as effective to convey,
encumber or bind the lands as though made in accordance with more prolix forms
heretofore in use.”
It is
therefore evident that Exhibit "E" in the case at bar is definitely
not registerable under the Land Registration Act. Also, the contention that
ownership over registered property may be acquired by prescription or adverse possession
is absolutely without merit. No title to registered land in derogation of that of
the registered owner shall be acquired by prescription or adverse possession. Prescription
is unavailing not only against the registered owner but also against his hereditary
successors.
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento